Little doubt possible : Distrikt Court must have direct contact with LO Zdrzalek ...

Little doubt possible : Amtsgericht Northeim must have direct contact with LO Zdrzalek ...

U N P O S S I B L E : can hardly be a coincidence

On 06/05/2011 a criminal complaint against the district court Northeim / Sell & Richterin Director Dr. Eisenhardt and always tries to blackmail on 11/06/2011 obvious nebulous Law Office me

Saturday 11 June 2011 - Zdrzalek-writing at the following link

Law Office Zdrzalek shown indirectly confessed

Not only that, while not deterred these times afraid to tell me intentionally
to coerce and to seek to extort = frightening

Legal deserve to know the truth on the principle of the legitimate right
freedom of expression are covered!
= What does finally, that such truths as assertions who equaled
natural and obvious to refute on provision of evidence are!

But nothing like this = pure, this time is this more obvious nebulous law firm
faithful - and ignored by their not really clever and even less honest statement,
I would falsehoods posted on the net to Once again,on my course carefully at
the content to be answered Contradictions!

= Thus, a court order can of course no automatic legitimacy mean in terms of
truth and reflect!
= What certainly still be known in the law firm would Zdrzalek.

= FACT
The district court Northeim proves significantly for me applicable civil rights -
apparently even intentionally almost in every Meaning flattened!

= Is of course also requires a district court Northeim, even my several times
there filed criminal charges against the 1und1/Vodafone-Imperien Collection
Agencies and Co + Co lawyers including the law firm Zdrzalek, 1 also to the
competent prosecutor pass! And 2 well of course to be seen the investigation
report with all the other subordinate = also a district court, in its own approach
to care little to exercise! Not even contradictions in this regard were from the
district court Northeim, content answered in detail.

= What inevitably the possibility of deliberate wrongdoing, to my disadvantage,
appear to be seriously possible!

= Are also in the law firm Zdrzalek my relevant Internetpublications, by then,
leading up my emails already long known!

= Seriously sincere lawyers had tried in case of false allegations there
For my part, otherwise have taken the initiative - and then certainly a long time
ago initiated legal action!
= For the first time I am asked then not to do this - very strange
but seriously does look like a desperation!

Opposition
Then I may call upon law firm unequivocally, I immediately implement Vodafone 

particularly significant because of me to Zdrzalek transmitted Zeweifelthe legality
of the Vodafone claims, which of course dutifully to be obtained by hand to
document recent letter from Vodafone to Place!

= Actually, if only an outrageous scandal that also Zdrzalek not yet
presented here has long been at all!
= Unbelievable, do one seek the attorneys general claims of citizens, without at
citizens with a letter signed manuscripts of the demands of the Client to submit!
= But the evidence is not really of seriousness - of legality but even not at all!

= Next is also given to this letter with any letter that this Law firm had acted completely legally!
So does this mean = least, not at all to know whether she acted lawfully
have because they have proceeded so maybe even in the Veregangenheit?

= So, a quasi-witness was then nachfollgender with handwritten Signature by the
law office Zdrzalek preferred to avoid, because something rather more would
constitute a criminal offense.

Moringen, the Thomas Karnasch 10/06/201

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Subject: Lawsuit against Judge & Director of the Sell Amtsgericht Northeim

= Thomas Karnasch
For Scheer Berg 2
37186 ​​Moringen

Prosecutor Göttingen
Scale Position 7
37073 Göttingen

Subject: Lawsuit against Judge Director & Sell and the alleged
twice as Judge of the District Court Northeim - Dr.Eisenhardt
(According to documents should be flat and Judge of the District Court of Göttingen)
http://verfassungsbeschwerde-gegen-marode-ju.blogspot.com/2011/04/widerspruch-gegen-das.html


Then I may auufordern prosecutors to do what the district court Northeim
has not done despite request: namely from the Vodafone empire Write to
the above termination letter claimed my part - to demand of them!

= This is alleged termination letter that is not at all = deliberate fraud!

= My termination was in this regard namely 31.08.2009 - in that same
Leave my further orders for larger notebook Flat!

= Furthermore, the district court has deliberately Northeim my logical
complaint against the Vodafone empire and fraudulent notes under beat!
= Obstruction of justice in the office!
= Abuse!

= Go, the District Court would simply Northeim my statemente with regard
to the perverse machinations of Vodafone and fraudulent Annex to pursue
intellectually!

= When several law firms and debt collection entitled to my Contradictions
out the phrase abuse, I had not reacted allegedly - to something of obvious
work around my substantive remarks on purpose - then turns serious when
asked why the district court in this Northeim deliberate fraud has contributed
so willingly? = Finally, an appeal is properly represent a reaction!

= And if more evidence collection and law firms as turn were, then that proves
even more so should test reaction on my part!

= Go I throw the judge and director of the District Court of Northeim,Sell
before,the bias of mine was filed applications for bias intentionally discarded and
omitted to have: that we already know - Sun director Sell!

Moringen, the Thomas Karnasch 05/06/2011